Ralph Lauren Polo and South African Polo are two different brands owned by two different companies and they are not affiliated with each other. A Group LTD. A Group LTD which defeated an attempt by Ralph Lauren to reclaim the mark in under the old law which recognised only geographical rights. Most South African consumers are unaware of the difference between the two and believe that they are buying the famous Ralph Lauren Polo brand.
The Ralph Lauren emblem faces towards the buttons of your shirt and the South African emblem face away. Copyright dispute resolution and litigation. Franchise agreements and negotiation. Company registrations. Please create an employee account to be able to mark statistics as favorites.
Then you can access your favorite statistics via the star in the header. Profit from additional features by authenticating your Admin account. Then you will be able to mark statistics as favourites and use personal statistics alerts. Please log in to access our additional functions. Yes, let me download! Exclusive Corporate feature.
Corporate Account. Statista Accounts: Access All Statistics. Basic Account. You only have access to basic statistics. Single Account. The ideal entry-level account for individual users. Corporate solution including all features.
Statistics on " Ralph Lauren " The most important statistics. The most important statistics. Further related statistics.
Further Content: You might find this interesting as well. Polo Association, dating back to Yes, kids, before Polo was a brand, polo was a sport. But I digress…. So, it seems that about 30 years ago, the USPA, as I like to call it, decided to start offering branded goods for sale. As my regular reader will know, likelihood of confusion is the chief issue in most trademark questions. It seems that the USPA has, in recent years, expanded its branding and licensing in ways that have brought it closer to conflict with the RL brands.
Among many other products, Ralph Lauren is well-known for its line of Polo perfumes. Currently, the U. A fashion designer picked that word for his products, and designed a logo featuring a polo player. Does that mean that the USPA should have lost some group of rights that it presumably held? Can I go out and start a fashion line under the brand name David Lizerbram Baseball, and then turn around and prevent Major League Baseball from exploiting the name and imagery of their sport?
Back when Ralph first picked the sport of polo as his sartorial inspiration, the USPA seems not to have been engaged in product creation or licensing at all.
0コメント